If it is true, (as it is,) that in men, for the sake of women (just as in women for the sake of men), there is implanted, by a defect of nature, the will to please; and if this sex of ours acknowledges to itself deceptive trickeries of form peculiarly its own—(such as) to cut the beard too sharply; to pluck it out here and there; to shave round about (the mouth); to arrange the hair, and disguise its hoariness by dyes; to remove all the incipient down all over the body; to fix (each particular hair) in its place with (some) womanly pigment; to smooth all the rest of the body by the aid of some rough powder or other: then, further, to take every opportunity for consulting the mirror; to gaze anxiously into it:— while yet, when (once) the knowledge of God has put an end to all wish to please by means of voluptuous attraction, all these things are rejected as frivolous, as hostile to modesty. For where God is, there modesty is; there is sobriety her assistant and ally. How, then, shall we practise modesty without her instrumental mean, that is, without sobriety? How, moreover, shall we bring sobriety to bear on the discharge of (the functions of) modesty, unless seriousness in appearance and in countenance, and in the general aspect of the entire man, mark our carriage?
- Making Sense of Scripture | Peter J. Leithart | First Things July 24, 2014
- First Brick | Peter J. Leithart | First Things July 24, 2014
- Hauerwas on Lewis on Pacifism - The Calvinist International July 24, 2014
- Reducing Abortion on the Margins Redux | Elizabeth Stoker Bruenig July 24, 2014
- The Earthquake of the Family (Or, the Silliness of ‘Free Love’) | Reformedish July 24, 2014
- RT @DZRishmawy: Mere Fidelity this week: How Does God Accommodate Himself to Us in Scripture? Science? OT Violence? Ethics? http://t.co/Av… 2 hours ago